現在企(qi)業(ye)(ye)法(fa)人名(ming)下(xia)都不是(shi)一(yi)(yi)家公司，很多(duo)企(qi)業(ye)(ye)想(xiang)通過(guo)變(bian)更(geng)勞(lao)動關系(xi)主(zhu)體(ti)來(lai)規(gui)避(bi)一(yi)(yi)些(xie)勞(lao)動用(yong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)方面(mian)的責任或風險，這種做(zuo)法(fa)行得通嗎？答案是(shi)否定的，這種情(qing)況(kuang)有一(yi)(yi)個(ge)名(ming)詞(ci)叫做(zuo)混同(tong)用(yong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)。企(qi)業(ye)(ye)把一(yi)(yi)部分員(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)放(fang)在A企(qi)業(ye)(ye)，又把一(yi)(yi)部分員(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)放(fang)進(jin)B企(qi)業(ye)(ye)。單位(wei)認(ren)為注(zhu)冊了幾(ji)(ji)家公司，一(yi)(yi)套人馬、幾(ji)(ji)個(ge)牌子(zi)隨意和(he)(he)員(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)變(bian)更(geng)用(yong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)主(zhu)體(ti)，可以規(gui)避(bi)一(yi)(yi)些(xie)用(yong)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)責任，這些(xie)觀念(nian)顯然是(shi)錯(cuo)誤的。現實(shi)這種情(qing)況(kuang)還很多(duo)，如(ru)果一(yi)(yi)個(ge)員(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)一(yi)(yi)直在一(yi)(yi)個(ge)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)作(zuo)地點，工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)作(zuo)，工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)作(zuo)崗位(wei)沒有變(bian)的話(hua)，由(you)同(tong)一(yi)(yi)個(ge)法(fa)人，同(tong)一(yi)(yi)個(ge)老板名(ming)下(xia)的幾(ji)(ji)家關聯公司連續和(he)(he)員(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)簽(qian)訂勞(lao)動合同(tong)。這種情(qing)況(kuang)下(xia)，勞(lao)動關系(xi)如(ru)何認(ren)定呢？按照實(shi)踐判例(li)的原則，勞(lao)動者主(zhu)張和(he)(he)哪(na)個(ge)單位(wei)構成(cheng)勞(lao)動關系(xi)，就認(ren)定哪(na)家單位(wei)和(he)(he)勞(lao)動者構成(cheng)勞(lao)動關系(xi)。
如(ru)果員(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)主張和(he)多(duo)家單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)都存在勞(lao)動關(guan)(guan)系的(de)話，那(nei)多(duo)家單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)共同承擔責任。按照法律的(de)規定，員(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)非因個人(ren)(ren)(ren)的(de)原因，由(you)一(yi)(yi)個用(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)被安(an)排(pai)到(dao)另一(yi)(yi)個用(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)工(gong)(gong)(gong)作(zuo)的(de)。新(xin)的(de)用(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)工(gong)(gong)(gong)作(zuo)員(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)在原用(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)的(de)工(gong)(gong)(gong)作(zuo)年(nian)限(xian)應當(dang)是要并入(ru)新(xin)用(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)的(de)。除非有一(yi)(yi)種(zhong)情(qing)況不用(yong)(yong)(yong)連續計(ji)(ji)算(suan)，那(nei)就(jiu)是原用(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)和(he)員(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)解(jie)除了(le)勞(lao)動關(guan)(guan)系，原用(yong)(yong)(yong)人(ren)(ren)(ren)單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)已經(jing)向(xiang)員(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)支付了(le)經(jing)濟(ji)補償(chang)。那(nei)新(xin)單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)按照新(xin)入(ru)職(zhi)辦理，雖然兩家公司有關(guan)(guan)聯，但(dan)這種(zhong)情(qing)況不連續計(ji)(ji)算(suan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)作(zuo)年(nian)限(xian)。如(ru)果原單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)沒有支付經(jing)濟(ji)補償(chang)，新(xin)單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)又(you)提出了(le)解(jie)除終止勞(lao)動合(he)同。在計(ji)(ji)算(suan)經(jing)濟(ji)補償(chang)或賠償(chang)金的(de)時候，應當(dang)把原單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)的(de)工(gong)(gong)(gong)作(zuo)年(nian)限(xian)合(he)并成(cheng)為新(xin)單(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)(dan)位(wei)(wei)的(de)工(gong)(gong)(gong)作(zuo)年(nian)限(xian)。
轉載：//bamboo-vinegar.cn/zixun_detail/117078.html
