給了(le)高(gao)(gao)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資，就一(yi)定能夠減少人員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)流失嗎？最(zui)好的(de)(de)(de)(de)員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)跟最(zui)一(yi)般的(de)(de)(de)(de)員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)，他們之(zhi)間的(de)(de)(de)(de)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資差距至少應該在5到10倍以上。應該有(you)一(yi)個(ge)(ge)2000塊錢(qian)的(de)(de)(de)(de)基本工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資的(de)(de)(de)(de)員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)，也有(you)一(yi)個(ge)(ge)能夠每(mei)個(ge)(ge)月拿(na)到2萬以上的(de)(de)(de)(de)員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)。如果基本的(de)(de)(de)(de)員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)，一(yi)般的(de)(de)(de)(de)員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)都拿(na)到2萬，那么最(zui)優秀的(de)(de)(de)(de)員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)他應該拿(na)到20萬才對。愿意(yi)給員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)高(gao)(gao)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資，但是(shi)給員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)高(gao)(gao)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)資的(de)(de)(de)(de)目的(de)(de)(de)(de)是(shi)什么？是(shi)留住人才，而(er)不是(shi)減少員(yuan)(yuan)(yuan)工(gong)(gong)(gong)(gong)流失，這是(shi)兩個(ge)(ge)完(wan)全不一(yi)樣的(de)(de)(de)(de)事(shi)情。
換句話(hua)，想表(biao)達的(de)(de)(de)就(jiu)是(shi)(shi)，如(ru)果(guo)這(zhe)(zhe)個(ge)(ge)員工(gong)(gong)真的(de)(de)(de)是(shi)(shi)人才(cai)(cai)，那(nei)就(jiu)應該(gai)給到他(ta)高工(gong)(gong)資。如(ru)果(guo)他(ta)不是(shi)(shi)人才(cai)(cai)，該(gai)流失就(jiu)流失，同時該(gai)拿低工(gong)(gong)資就(jiu)拿低工(gong)(gong)資。個(ge)(ge)人一直覺得，對于(yu)一個(ge)(ge)企業，老板一定(ding)要舍得花錢給那(nei)些人才(cai)(cai)，去掙錢，但(dan)是(shi)(shi)不是(shi)(shi)人才(cai)(cai)掙不到錢就(jiu)很正(zheng)(zheng)常，這(zhe)(zhe)個(ge)(ge)才(cai)(cai)能(neng)夠對人才(cai)(cai)有真正(zheng)(zheng)的(de)(de)(de)激(ji)勵，就(jiu)是(shi)(shi)我只(zhi)要努力，我只(zhi)要做出好的(de)(de)(de)業績，我只(zhi)要做出好的(de)(de)(de)績效，我就(jiu)能(neng)拿出很高的(de)(de)(de)工(gong)(gong)資。但(dan)是(shi)(shi)如(ru)果(guo)想通過給高工(gong)(gong)資來減少(shao)人才(cai)(cai)流失，這(zhe)(zhe)個(ge)(ge)就(jiu)是(shi)(shi)錯(cuo)的(de)(de)(de)。
轉載：//bamboo-vinegar.cn/zixun_detail/118433.html
